Scissor Steel Types: Grades, Hardness and Materials

Scissor steel types include named producer grades such as VG-10, standard designations such as 440C, maker-specific materials, and broader terms such as cobalt alloy or Damascus. This library explains those names, connects published chemistry and hardness to their sources, and helps you compare the material with a finished scissor’s construction and service requirements.

Close-up of a brushed metal surface with circular machining patterns.

Start with the name on the scissor

A precise material name makes a useful first filter. It tells you which producer document or maker specification to look for. The directory below groups names by what they describe, with steel-reading guides in their own section.

Reference table: Wording on a listing, What the wording describes, Useful next reference
Wording on a listing What the wording describes Useful next reference
VG-10 or 14C28N A named producer grade VG-10 or 14C28N
440C or SUS440C A material designation associated with standards 440C and SUS440C
Nano Powder Metal or CBA-1 A scissor maker’s material designation Nano Powder Metal or CBA-1
Cobalt alloy or Damascus A material family or layered construction Cobalt alloy or Damascus
Sintered metal A processing description Sintered metal
Japanese, Korean or Solingen steel An origin or geographic description Country of origin

Three ways to read a hardness figure

Hardness is a material property measured on a stated scale. In a scissor specification, retain both the value and the thing it describes.

Reference table: Published example, What it describes, How to use it
Published example What it describes How to use it
Takefu VG-10: at least 60 HRC The producer’s quench-hardness lower bound Read it with Takefu’s grade table
Jaguar KAMIYU: 59 HRC The maker’s specification for a named hair scissor Compare the KAMIYU model statement with other exact models
Alleima 14C28N: 55–62 HRC A recommended range for knife applications Keep the knife-application scope attached to the range

The first two values are different kinds of records. Combining them into a “59–60 HRC VG-10 range” would lose the producer’s lower bound and the finished model’s identity. The hardness reference explains test scales, locations, tolerances and conversions.

Read chemistry as a material description

Composition tables identify elements and their published amounts. A nominal or representative value, a maximum limit and an allowed range mean different things. For example, Carpenter’s 440C table lists a carbon range, while Takefu’s VG-10 table gives representative figures. Preserve those distinctions when comparing materials.

Heat treatment and construction help turn a material into a working blade. Read a chemistry table alongside the producer’s processing guidance and the scissor maker’s geometry. The composition guide and heat-treatment reference provide the next steps.

Compare the finished scissors

A useful comparison connects material information with the tool you will use:

Reference table: Record, What to compare
Record What to compare
Material Exact designation, producer or maker source, and the blade parts covered
Finished hardness Maker, model, value, test context and tolerance where published
Cutting construction Blade geometry, edge, length and handedness
Fit and operation Handle, pivot, tension adjustment and a trial with the correct hand
Ownership Care instructions, approved service, parts, warranty and total cost

Two scissors with the same steel name can differ in these other fields. Use model documentation and a suitable trial to resolve the practical questions that chemistry alone leaves open.

Care and sharpening

Use the exact model’s cleaning, lubrication, tension and service instructions. Workload, blade condition, alignment, incidents and previous sharpening all affect when attention is needed. A material grade does not create a universal service calendar.

Record the maker and model, cutting symptoms, care history and any impact before consulting a service provider. The scissor-maintenance guide and sharpening reference explain what information helps a technician assess the whole tool.

Sources and further reading

Each material entry keeps its detailed source trail and unresolved questions. Directory grouping describes the kind of name; it does not rank finished scissors. The hero photograph illustrates a metal surface and does not identify a steel grade.

Start with a material question

Five starting points for identifying a steel and reading its published specifications.

Producer grades

Named grades published by steel producers. Compare a producer specification with the exact finished model.

Aichi Steel

AUS-8

Aichi blade steel; separate plate chemistry, processing-reference hardness and named scissor specifications.

59.0 HRC; Aichi Techno Metal Fukaumi; published quench-and-temper reference for AUS-8 material; not a finished-scissor value. Maker material source
58–59 HRC; Kanetsune USA WS-38 thinning scissors; maker-stated finished-scissor hardness. Model source
Read AUS-8 reference →

Alleima (formerly Sandvik Materials Technology)

12C27

Alleima blade steel; nominal chemistry and knife-application hardness need a separate scissor record.

54–61 HRC; Alleima; producer application guidance; not a finished-scissor specification. Mill source
No model figure cited.
Read 12C27 reference →

12C27M

Alleima blade steel with documented scissor applications; distinct from 12C27.

53–59 HRC; Alleima; producer application guidance; not a finished-scissor specification. Mill source
No model figure cited.
Read 12C27M reference →

13C26

Alleima razor steel; dated chemistry and application hardness are separately sourced.

55–62 HRC; Alleima; producer application guidance; not a finished-scissor specification. Mill source
No model figure cited.
Read 13C26 reference →

14C28N

Alleima nitrogen-alloyed stainless; published knife guidance and nominal chemistry are available.

55–62 HRC; Alleima; recommended range for knife applications. Mill source
No model figure cited.
Read 14C28N reference →

Böhler

Proterial (formerly Hitachi Metals)

ATS-34

Proterial blade steel: typical Cr 14%, Mo 4% and separate delivery and hardening hardness.

≥59 HRC; Proterial; published hardening hardness; producer material lower bound. Mill source
No model figure cited.
Read ATS-34 reference →

GIN1

Proterial GIN1 blade steel; producer chemistry and hardening hardness need finished-scissor context.

≥57 HRC; Proterial; Producer hardening-hardness wording “57 over”, normalized here as ≥57 HRC; not a finished-scissor specification or upper bound.. Mill source
No model figure cited.
Read GIN1 reference →

GIN3

Proterial GIN3 blade steel; producer chemistry and hardening hardness need finished-scissor context.

≥59 HRC; Proterial; Producer hardening-hardness wording “59 over”, normalized here as ≥59 HRC; not a finished-scissor specification or upper bound.. Mill source
No model figure cited.
Read GIN3 reference →

ZDP-189

Proterial powder-metallurgy stainless grade; keep material and finished-scissor hardness separate.

≥65 HRC; Proterial; published hardening hardness; producer material lower bound, not finished-scissor hardness. Mill source
No model figure cited.
Read ZDP-189 reference →

Takefu Special Steel

SG2

Takefu SG2 powder steel; published quench hardness and named Kasho model figures have separate scopes.

≥62 HRC; Takefu Special Steel; published quench hardness. Mill source
61–62 HRC; Kasho 6.5-inch SlideCut; maker-stated finished-scissor hardness. Model source
Read SG2 reference →

V1

Takefu carbon blade steel, distinct from stainless VG-1.

≥64 HRC; Takefu Special Steel; published quench hardness. Mill source
No model figure cited.
Read V1 reference →

VG-1

Takefu stainless blade steel with barber and beauty scissors listed among its applications.

≥61 HRC; Takefu Special Steel; published quench hardness. Mill source
No model figure cited.
Read VG-1 reference →

VG-10

Takefu cobalt-bearing stainless; compare published quench hardness with named scissor specifications.

≥60 HRC; Takefu Special Steel; published quench hardness. Mill source
59 HRC; Jaguar KAMIYU; maker-stated finished-scissor hardness. Model source
Read VG-10 reference →

VG-2

Takefu stainless blade steel; published chemistry differs from VG-1 and VG-5.

≥58 HRC; Takefu Special Steel; published quench hardness. Mill source
No model figure cited.
Read VG-2 reference →

VG-5

Takefu stainless blade steel with more carbon and molybdenum than VG-2, plus vanadium.

≥59 HRC; Takefu Special Steel; published quench hardness. Mill source
No model figure cited.
Read VG-5 reference →

voestalpine Precision Strip AB

Standard designations

Material designations used in standards. Keep the standard, edition and product form with the material record.

4034 Stainless

European 1.4034 stainless designation; keep the material number with its specification.

≤55 HRC; Deutsche Edelstahlwerke; Historical producer guidance after the described hardening and stress relief at 200°C (revision dated 1 August 2007); not a finished-scissor specification or universal grade maximum.. Mill source
No model figure cited.
Read 4034 Stainless reference →

4037 Stainless

European 1.4037 stainless designation; identify the supplied condition and finished-tool evidence.

≤60 HRC; Deutsche Edelstahlwerke; Historical producer guidance after the described hardening and stress relief at 200°C (revision dated 1 August 2007); not a finished-scissor specification or universal grade maximum.. Mill source
No model figure cited.
Read 4037 Stainless reference →

440C

High-carbon martensitic stainless designation; compare producer chemistry and heat-treated hardness.

≈60 HRC; Carpenter Technology; heat-treated CarTech 440C under the producer datasheet conditions. Mill source
No model figure cited.
Read 440C reference →

SKD-11

Daido DC11/JIS SKD11: tool-steel chemistry, qualified standard correspondence and conditional hardness.

≥62 HRC; Daido Steel; DC11 brochure quenching entry: 1000–1050°C followed by air cooling; a producer processing condition, not a finished-scissor specification or universal service hardness. Mill source
≤255 HBW; Daido Steel; DC11 annealing entry: 830–880°C followed by slow cooling; separate material condition, not a Rockwell C value. Maker material source
≥61 HRC; Daido Steel; DC11 tempering entry: 150–200°C followed by air cooling; producer material-processing reference, not finished-scissor hardness. Maker material source
56–58 HRC; Daido Steel; DC11 brochure parenthesized alternative tempering entry: 500–550°C followed by air cooling; retain this separate condition. Maker material source
No model figure cited.
Read SKD-11 reference →

SUS410

SUS410: JIS martensitic stainless; composition limits and producer hardness examples have separate scopes.

43 HRC; JFE Steel; producer example of hardness after quenching; not a finished-scissor specification or guaranteed grade-wide range. Mill source
No model figure cited.
Read SUS410 reference →

SUS420J2

SUS420J2: JIS blade-material designation; composition limits and producer quench examples need model context.

57 HRC; JFE Steel; producer example of hardness after quenching; not a finished-scissor specification or guaranteed grade-wide range. Mill source
No model figure cited.
Read SUS420J2 reference →

SUS440C

JIS stainless designation with named plate data; 440C correspondence is not an interchangeability guarantee.

60.0 HRC; Aichi Techno Metal Fukaumi; published quench-and-temper reference for SUS440C material; not finished-scissor hardness. Maker material source
No model figure cited.
Read SUS440C reference →

Scissor-maker material names

Material names used by scissor makers. Each entry explains the maker claim and the models it covers.

CBA-1

Joewell cobalt-base blade material: historical composition, Vickers hardness and named models.

637 HV; Joewell; 2016 product guide; historical CBA-1 blade-material figure; test conditions not supplied in the cited table. Maker material source
No model figure cited.
Read CBA-1 reference →

HYS

Hayashi powder high-speed material; 63–64 HRC narrative and 64 HRC summary are maker-level statements.

63–64 HRC; Hayashi Scissors; HYS material narrative; summary on the same page states 64 HRC; not an independently measured finished-model result. Maker material source
64 HRC; Hayashi Scissors; HYS material summary; narrative on the same page gives 63–64 HRC; retained as a separate source statement. Maker material source
No model figure cited.
Read HYS reference →

HYS-MAX67

Hayashi maker designation; MARK-IV and DRY models carry a published 67 HRC blade claim.

No material figure cited.
67 HRC; Hayashi Scissors HYS MAX67 MARK-IV (blade portion; maker-published); maker-stated finished-scissor hardness. Model source
67 HRC; Hayashi Scissors HYS MAX67 MARK-IV DRY (blade portion; maker-published); maker-stated finished-scissor hardness. Model source
Read HYS-MAX67 reference →

SOLINOX54

Jaguar PRE STYLE material designation; 54 HRC is published for the named PRE STYLE P model.

No material figure cited.
54 HRC; Jaguar PRE STYLE P (displayed item 82655); maker-stated finished-scissor hardness. Model source
Read SOLINOX54 reference →

Supplier and unresolved designations

Labels whose producer, standard or relationship to another grade needs clarification. Published supplier data stays attributed.

ZA-18

Cobalt-bearing designation with named shear examples; its mill attribution remains unconfirmed.

No material figure cited.
61–63 HRC; Saki Precision; maker-stated finished-scissor hardness. Model source
Read ZA-18 reference →

Material families and layered constructions

Broader material or construction terms. A family can contain several distinct grades or implementations.

Shirogami (White Paper Steel)

White Paper carbon-steel family; identify the numbered grade and its own specification.

≥60 HRC; Proterial; Shirogami 1; producer hardening lower bound; standard material-processing context, not finished-scissor hardness. Maker material source
≥60 HRC; Proterial; Shirogami 2; producer hardening lower bound; standard material-processing context, not finished-scissor hardness. Maker material source
≤223 HBW; Proterial; Shirogami 1; producer delivery upper bound; standard material-processing context, not finished-scissor hardness. Maker material source
≤217 HBW; Proterial; Shirogami 2; producer delivery upper bound; standard material-processing context, not finished-scissor hardness. Maker material source
No model figure cited.
Read Shirogami (White Paper Steel) reference →

Origin labels

Geographic descriptions of material supply. Check the actual grade and finished-product origin separately.

Manufacturing processes

Process names describe how material is made or consolidated. Record the grade alongside the process.

Ceramic materials

Non-metal blade materials with different property and test conventions from steel.

How to read steel specifications

Practical guides to composition tables, hardness measurements and comparing source records.

Quick clarifications

Frequently Asked Questions

5 answers you can open one at a time
What is the best steel for professional scissors?

There is no universal best grade. Compare exact finished scissors using verified material identity, geometry, heat-treatment evidence if published, fit, condition, trial, care, warranty, service route, and current ownership cost.

Does a higher HRC number mean better scissors?

No. Hardness is one measured property, and values are comparable only when scale, method, part, location, condition, range, and tolerance are known. It does not measure fit, sharpness, toughness, corrosion, edge life, or product quality by itself.

Can a steel label predict sharpening frequency?

No universal interval follows from a grade name. Service depends on the exact tool, geometry, condition, workload, incidents, care, maker guidance, and qualified inspection.

Does Japanese steel mean a scissor was made in Japan?

No. Material source and finished-product country of origin are separate claims. Verify the producer and grade, then separately verify the exact model’s manufacturing and legal origin wording.

Can two scissors with the same steel perform differently?

Yes. Material traceability, heat treatment, blade and edge geometry, assembly, set, condition, fit, care, and service can differ. A grade name is not a finished-tool certificate.